8 Basic Software Development Models And Methodologies You Should Know
When developing software from scratch, there are some specific steps that software engineers have to take. These are called software development cycles; they usually include planning, designing, producing, testing, etc. This article will explore eight different software development life cycles (SDLCs) that have become widely applied in software development companies worldwide.
First, let’s understand what SDLC methodologies are.
Like said above, SDLCs are the essential steps that all engineers have to undertake, from the beginning to the end, when developing software. As a general rule, the SDLC process includes six steps:
- Requirement analysis
- UI/UX Design
- Software development
- Testing and Run Quality Assurance
- Deployment of final code
These development process phases remain the same; however, software developers can implement functions at each stage in various ways. These are called SDLC methodologies. Each methodology uses a different hierarchy to perform the development process differently. Today, there are more than 10 types of SDLC models are in use, but only eight main kinds of SDLC methodologies you should know since they’re the most popular models. Still, all development models’ common goal is to help engineers effectively create high-quality software.
Generally, the software development model chosen for a specific project depends on factors like the level of expertise required, business requirements, timeline, and budget. Therefore, to make a well-informed decision, software engineers need to understand all the methodologies of SDLC.
Here is the outline of popular SDLC models.
The SDLC models in the lower left quadrants of the chart are easier to implement, use and manage since they take the sequential flow; the higher they are on the map, the more flexible they are when the process needs to be changed in the future.
The methodology on the left side of the chart indicates low customer engagement, as you move further to the right side, the models will be more cooperative and engage customers more in different stages of the software development life cycle.
Types of SDLC Models
As you can see, the eight types of SDLC models are Waterfall, V Model, Incremental Model, Spiral Model, RUP, Scrum, XP, Kanban.
The Waterfall model follows through all development stages: analysis, design, coding/implementation, testing, deployment, maintenance, respectively. Each phase has specific delivery deliverables and is strictly documented. The next step cannot start before the previous one is completed.
Therefore, for instance, software requirements cannot be re-assessed during the development/coding stage. It is also impossible to view and test the software until the last deployment phase is completed, which leads to higher project risks and unpredictable project outcomes. Testing is usually rushed, and fixing errors is costly.
This model can be used in:
- Small and medium-sized simple projects (developing small companies’ websites) with clearly defined and unchanging requirements.
- Projects that require tighter controls, predictable budgets, and timelines like government projects.
- Projects that adhere to a variety of rules and regulations like healthcare projects.
- Projects using well-known technology stacks and tools.
V-Model (Validation and Verification Model)
The V-model is a linear model with each stage has a corresponding test run. Workflow organization means excellent quality control, but at the same time, it makes the V-model among the most expensive and time-consuming models. Additionally, although defects in the requirements specification, code, and architecture errors can be found early, changes during the development process are still expensive and challenging. Like the Waterfall model, all requirements are gathered and summarized from the beginning and cannot be changed.
This model can be used in:
- Projects that require no errors and downtime like medical software or flight management software.
Iterative and Incremental model
The SDLC, which is based on the Incremental model, is divided into multiple iterations. New software modules will be added in each iteration with no or little changes in the previously added modules. The development cycle can be sequential or parallel. Parallel development adds to delivery speed, while multiple iterative development cycles can make the project lengthy and costly.
With Iterative development, software changes in each iteration, development, and evolvement. Since each iteration is built on the previous iteration, the software design remains consistent.
Since the software is distributed in parts, there is no need for a complete specification from the beginning of the project, and subtle changes to requirements may occur during the development process. However, the requirements cannot be changed entirely - the necessary conditions must be defined from the beginning, especially for system design in incremental development, because additional integration of distributed software may become a problem.
Some minor requirements may need to be altered during the development process; the SDLC model can require some customers’ participation.
This model can be used in:
- A large-scale and lengthy development project that required basic functionality delivery fast like microservices, or web services.
This model focuses on a comprehensive risk assessment. Therefore, to make the most out of the Spiral model, you’ll have to engage people with s solid background in conducting a risk assessment. Typically, the Spiral cycle lasts around six months and starts with four key activities - comprehensive planning, risk analysis, prototyping, and review of previously delivered parts. The repeated spiral cycle significantly extended the project timeframes.
This is the model with a lot of customer involvement. They can participate in the exploration and review phase of each cycle. During the development phase, customer modifications are not acceptable.
This model can be used in:
- Projects with unclear business needs/innovations or too ambitious
- Large and complex projects
- Research and development (R&D) or introduce new services or products.
RUP (The Rational Unified Process)
The Rational Unified Process (RUP) is a combination of a linear framework and an iterative framework. This model divides the software development process into four phases - inception, elaboration, construction, and conversion. Except for the first phase, each step usually has multiple iterations. All basic operations ( requirements, design, etc.) of the development process are executed parallel across the four RUP stages, although the intensity is different.
This model helps to build flexible and, at the same time, stable solutions; however, the model is not as fast and adaptable as the ones in the Agile group (we’ll explore later). Customer engagement, document strength, and repeatability length can vary according to project needs.
This model can be used in:
- Large-scale and high-risk projects, use-case based development, and fast development of high-quality software.
The next three SDLC methodologies are falling under the umbrella of Agile methodologies. The premier global survey of project management practitioners conducted by PMI, Pulse of the Profession 2017, revealed that 70 percent of organizations had adopted the Agile approach in their IT projects. In simpler words, the Agile approach focuses on iterative development, constant communication, and early customer feedback for better improvement.
Each Agile’s iterative process usually takes several weeks to deliver a complete software version. This group’s models focus more on providing a functioning part of the application and software testing activities rather than detailed software documentation (detailed requirement specification, detailed architecture description). This enables rapid development, but because there is no detailed software description, the maintenance phase is complicated as more time is needed to find out the problem.
Another thing about the Agile model is that it’s all about working closely both across the team and with customers. Stakeholders can review the development progress and give revaluation of the priority of tasks for the future iteration to increase the ROI and make sure business goals and user needs align.
Hence, you’ll expect frequent releases and continuous software improvement when it comes to Agile models.
To sum up, the benefit Agile models bring: they allow quick updates, feature addition, easy fixes, and changes; these characteristics help deliver applications that satisfy user needs.
The only disadvantage of Agile is the lack of detailed software documentation; therefore, it’s hard to identify the problem, resulting in difficulty to estimate the budget, timeline, and the human resource needed for the project.
Agile models can be used in:
- Any startup initiatives where end-users’ early feedback is indispensable.
- Medium-sized projects in the custom development phase and their business requirement can’t be converted into detailed software requirements.
- Large-scale projects can be divided into small functional parts easily and can be gradually developed in each iteration.
We recommend reading this article to have a clearer understanding of the differences between Agile methodologies Vs Waterfall.
This is one of the most popular Agile models. The sprint/iterations usually take from 2 - 4 weeks to finish. Therefore, they required careful planning and evaluation in advance. Once the sprint operation is confirmed, no changes are allowed.
XP (Extreme Programming)
Using Extreme Programming (XP), the regular repetition lasts 1-2 weeks. If the team has not worked with similar software, it even allows for changes after the iteration’s launches. This flexibility creates a significantly complicated delivery of quality software. To alleviate the problem, XP requires pair programming, test-oriented development and test automation, continuous integration (CI), small releases, simple software design, and regulations compiled with coding standards.
As for Kanban SDLC, the key distinguishing feature is the lack of apparent iterations. If used, they will be kept extremely short, known as a daily sprint. The focus is placed on visualizing the plan. The team uses the Kanban board tool to present all the project activities, the quantity, the person in charge, and their progress. Such transparency helps to estimate the most pressing tasks more accurately. Furthermore, the model does not have a separate planning phase so that a new change requirement can be introduced at any time. Kanban also allows the team to communicate with the customer frequently, this allows the customer to check the result of their work at any time, and they can even hold meetings with the project team every day.
Due to its characteristics, the Kanban model is used in most software support and evolution projects.
We can’t say which types of SDLC methodologies are better; each of them offers unique value for each project that you’ll encounter in your career. Hence, finding the right one is essential. If you need more advice on software development life cycle methodologies, you can always reach out to TP&P Technology.
We are proud to be the top software development companies in the Asian region. With a team of experts proficient in various programming languages and extensive development experience, we can give you accurate advice on each model suitable for your projects.
And if you've been wondering about software development outsourcing rates, check out our offshore services cost and guideline to bear in mind the average cost that you'll be expected to pay.